Рейтинг
+36881.37
голосов: 69
Сила
93201.87
kuzlich
Кузька
Моих навыков и сложившихся обстоятельств хватило, чтобы заработать травмы не выезжая за черту города)))
Мечтают ли андроиды о электроовцах) Ну и аватар намекает как бы
Каска отработала на 146%, основной удар пришелся в правую лобную часть со второго фото, и она погасила всю энергию. А меня слегка потошнило и все.
В больничку попал из-за спины, видимо от головы удар ушел в хребет, сегодня уже точно врачи после томограммы скажут. Так бы вообще отделался только плохим настроением)
Всем спасибо за слова поддержки!
Всем спасибо за слова поддержки!
Я не расист, но шутки про расы обычно весьма колоритные, чем и доставляют. А если кто-то просто по расовой принадлежности определяет плохой человек или нет — то у него беда с башкой (убеждениями), это все нормальные люди понимают.
Ну и кто не катается — тот не падает, бывает) Спасибо!
Ну и кто не катается — тот не падает, бывает) Спасибо!
Каждый видит то, что хочет. Даже на розовом ресурсе вышел громадный пост про сии актуальные события и как Пинк будет их поддерживать. Про соцсети вообще молчу. Так что да, на фоне всех этих новостей нормальный фотоотчёт из боксов для меня был глотком свежего воздуха, что собственно и написал. Не стоит оскорбляться из-за надуманных причин
Интервью с главным организатором кубка веломарафонов Ленобласти, Алексеем Здебловским. / Mikhailutkin 9
Сделал читабельно, убрал лишние отступы и мусор, думаю так даже самому автору понравится больше.
1:35 зашло. Словно на противопехотную мину наскочил
Так и есть. Просто опрос ради опроса, менять ногу или переучиваться явно не стоит. Но привыкнуть с любой ногой спереди проходить любые повороты, и банально делать банник — будет полезно.
Да я не по выборке сужу. Скорее всего мой опыт не репрезентативный, но среди всех местных катающихся только один человек с правой ногой впереди. Пиндосы/бриты часто ездят с правой впереди (судя по видео). Но вопрос определённо интересный.
Сужу по катающимся знакомым. У нас редко кто с правой ногой впереди ездит. Я сам с левой впереди, но на борде гуфи почему-то.
Опрос запилить не проблема.
Не обязательно, это может быть нормой для пиндосов, там же все левши поголовно. Думаю у нас диаметрально противоположная ситуация.
Santa Cruz Syndicate показали велосипеды для сезона 2020 (если такой вообще будет) / Велоиндустрия 26
Я как-то делал надписи подписями и пришло пару человек, которые попросили вернуть всё обратно.
У меня шатуны LG1 11 года кажись. За 9 лет никаких проблем с ними или кареткой не было. Периодически смазку в подшипниках меняю и всё. Хз как там с остальной продукцией, но с шатунами всё хорошо.
Хм. Я просто к тому, что ни у кого из скилловичков вроде как нет проблем с переходом на ньюскул. Если техника есть — просто привык к трамвайчику и всё. Мне кажется так привыкаешь к любому новому байку, у всех свои особенности есть же.
А если техника мешка, на новом трамвайчике ты всё равно мешок, который за счёт геометрии катится быстрее. Т.е. прямо ты станешь быстрее ехать, но в поворотах проблем меньше не будет.
Можно подробнее про технику поворотов и управления на трамваях?
Hi Anatolii,
My name is Pablo Carrasco, co-Founder of ROTOR.
In the bike industry we do really have a problem if we talk about standards… It happens everywhere along the complete bicycle: BB’s, head-sets, hub’s lengths and their axles, disc brakes rotor attachments…
Taking just about your question, about Direct-Mount “cranks”, I understand your are talking about the Direct-Mount attachment, normally intended for spare spiders, spider based power-meters, or of course for just one-by chainrings:
Yes there are too many. Probably each crank manufacturer has got its proprietary one.
A main reason is that right now there are so many “shit”-patents about every small and even silly detail in the bike, that to copy something which one of the biggest is using is a big risk. This is one of the reasons for sure… And make sense for them trying to protect their own attachment: imagine to avoid the competitors to sell power-meters for your crankset when you are one of the big sellers… That is not our case.
In ROTOR we have been using our own spline interface for many years, but having different solutions for 24mm and 30 mm axles, and their designs were based on the integrity and specifically fatigue resistance of our lightened crank-arms, at that time all of them made of aluminum: using other manufacturer options would have result in a heavier product at that time… That spline attachment was not patented, and some power-meter manufacturer as well as chainring manufacturers have been selling products for our crank-arms for years.
But in the recent years we have adopted a new “standard” which is close to perfection in terms of fatigue resistance, small enough in dimensions, very neutral about interfering power-meter calibration values, and reproducible because for this interface attachment we just use a 45 teeth DIN standard. Why?:
Apart of all the advantages I have already mentioned, for us, the use of oval rings is a real advantage in which we have been pioneers, and the main reason for which we are world-wide known. Nowadays there are many manufacturers of oval chainrings, but only 2 of them (first ROTOR and then OSYMETRICS as well) have been recruiting a big list of professional victories including Golds at the Olympics and World Championships as well as Tour de France or other ProTour races… we have been always investing in Road cycling, MTB and Triathlon, with a 20 years history of racing success. Having said that, what make sense to this number of 45 is what we call OCP (patented), which is all about the option to adjust the orientation of the OVAL for the best biomechanics performance you can obtain when ovalizing your pedal stroke:
Having 45 teeth result in 180º/45 = 4 degree increments for each OCP value.
Furthermore combining a Direct-Mount with 45 teeth with an axle-to-arm spline connection with 8 groves, we result in 360 different combinations which means that we can adjust the orientation of the OVAL every 1 degree (as an example, it is like when you can adjust your seat-post height every 1mm), when other manufacturers using our oval shape just can say that they have designed the perfect clocking (orientation) for each chainring size… but it is never a possibility for each cyclist.
Anatolii, I hope all this explanation can help you, but I am open for you to come back with whichever question at my e-mail address.
Remember that for whatever technical question about cycling and bicycles you can contact me… And hopefully we will meet somehow in whichever Bike Show in the future. I know that you there in Russia have a much better situation than here in Spain, but take care.
Best regards,
Pablo
My name is Pablo Carrasco, co-Founder of ROTOR.
In the bike industry we do really have a problem if we talk about standards… It happens everywhere along the complete bicycle: BB’s, head-sets, hub’s lengths and their axles, disc brakes rotor attachments…
Taking just about your question, about Direct-Mount “cranks”, I understand your are talking about the Direct-Mount attachment, normally intended for spare spiders, spider based power-meters, or of course for just one-by chainrings:
Yes there are too many. Probably each crank manufacturer has got its proprietary one.
A main reason is that right now there are so many “shit”-patents about every small and even silly detail in the bike, that to copy something which one of the biggest is using is a big risk. This is one of the reasons for sure… And make sense for them trying to protect their own attachment: imagine to avoid the competitors to sell power-meters for your crankset when you are one of the big sellers… That is not our case.
In ROTOR we have been using our own spline interface for many years, but having different solutions for 24mm and 30 mm axles, and their designs were based on the integrity and specifically fatigue resistance of our lightened crank-arms, at that time all of them made of aluminum: using other manufacturer options would have result in a heavier product at that time… That spline attachment was not patented, and some power-meter manufacturer as well as chainring manufacturers have been selling products for our crank-arms for years.
But in the recent years we have adopted a new “standard” which is close to perfection in terms of fatigue resistance, small enough in dimensions, very neutral about interfering power-meter calibration values, and reproducible because for this interface attachment we just use a 45 teeth DIN standard. Why?:
Apart of all the advantages I have already mentioned, for us, the use of oval rings is a real advantage in which we have been pioneers, and the main reason for which we are world-wide known. Nowadays there are many manufacturers of oval chainrings, but only 2 of them (first ROTOR and then OSYMETRICS as well) have been recruiting a big list of professional victories including Golds at the Olympics and World Championships as well as Tour de France or other ProTour races… we have been always investing in Road cycling, MTB and Triathlon, with a 20 years history of racing success. Having said that, what make sense to this number of 45 is what we call OCP (patented), which is all about the option to adjust the orientation of the OVAL for the best biomechanics performance you can obtain when ovalizing your pedal stroke:
Having 45 teeth result in 180º/45 = 4 degree increments for each OCP value.
Furthermore combining a Direct-Mount with 45 teeth with an axle-to-arm spline connection with 8 groves, we result in 360 different combinations which means that we can adjust the orientation of the OVAL every 1 degree (as an example, it is like when you can adjust your seat-post height every 1mm), when other manufacturers using our oval shape just can say that they have designed the perfect clocking (orientation) for each chainring size… but it is never a possibility for each cyclist.
Anatolii, I hope all this explanation can help you, but I am open for you to come back with whichever question at my e-mail address.
Remember that for whatever technical question about cycling and bicycles you can contact me… And hopefully we will meet somehow in whichever Bike Show in the future. I know that you there in Russia have a much better situation than here in Spain, but take care.
Best regards,
Pablo
Сам помогал товарищу в горах поправить его неадекватно работающий 11ск eagle, естественно про линейку он и не думал даже, т.к. обслуживается в «мастерской.» Тонкую доводку прервали подоспевшие шашлычки, и все сошлись на том, что по приезду домой товарищ поищет ту самую красную линейку.
kuzlich